/* Package validator implements value validations for structs and individual fields based on tags. It can also handle Cross Field and Cross Struct validation for nested structs and has the ability to dive into arrays and maps of any type. Why not a better error message? because this library intends for you to handle your own error messages. Why should I handle my own errors? Many reasons, for us building an internationalized application I needed to know the field and what validation failed so that I could provide an error in the users specific language. if fieldErr.Field == "Name" { switch fieldErr.ErrorTag case "required": return "Translated string based on field + error" default: return "Translated string based on field" } Validation functions return type error Doing things this way is actually the way the standard library does, see the file.Open method here: https://golang.org/pkg/os/#Open. They return type error to avoid the issue discussed in the following, where err is always != nil: http://stackoverflow.com/a/29138676/3158232 https://github.com/bluesuncorp/validator/issues/134 validator only returns nil or ValidationErrors as type error; so in you code all you need to do is check if the error returned is not nil, and if it's not type cast it to type ValidationErrors like so err.(validator.ValidationErrors) Custom Functions Custom functions can be added // Structure func customFunc(v *Validate, topStruct reflect.Value, currentStructOrField reflect.Value, field reflect.Value, fieldType reflect.Type, fieldKind reflect.Kind, param string) bool { if whatever { return false } return true } validate.RegisterValidation("custom tag name", customFunc) // NOTES: using the same tag name as an existing function // will overwrite the existing one Cross Field Validation Cross Field Validation can be done via the following tags: eqfield, nefield, gtfield, gtefield, ltfield, ltefield, eqcsfield, necsfield, gtcsfield, ftecsfield, ltcsfield and ltecsfield. If however some custom cross field validation is required, it can be done using a custom validation. Why not just have cross fields validation tags i.e. only eqcsfield and not eqfield; the reason is efficiency, if you want to check a field within the same struct eqfield only has to find the field on the same struct, 1 level; but if we used eqcsfield it could be multiple levels down. type Inner struct { StartDate time.Time } type Outer struct { InnerStructField *Inner CreatedAt time.Time `validate:"ltecsfield=InnerStructField.StartDate"` } now := time.Now() inner := &Inner{ StartDate: now, } outer := &Outer{ InnerStructField: inner, CreatedAt: now, } errs := validate.Struct(outer) // NOTE: when calling validate.Struct(val) topStruct will be the top level struct passed // into the function // when calling validate.FieldWithValue(val, field, tag) val will be // whatever you pass, struct, field... // when calling validate.Field(field, tag) val will be nil Multiple Validators Multiple validators on a field will process in the order defined type Test struct { Field `validate:"max=10,min=1"` } // max will be checked then min Bad Validator definitions are not handled by the library type Test struct { Field `validate:"min=10,max=0"` } // this definition of min max will never succeed Baked In Validators and Tags NOTE: Baked In Cross field validation only compares fields on the same struct, if cross field + cross struct validation is needed your own custom validator should be implemented. NOTE2: comma is the default separator of validation tags, if you wish to have a comma included within the parameter i.e. excludesall=, you will need to use the UTF-8 hex representation 0x2C, which is replaced in the code as a comma, so the above will become excludesall=0x2C NOTE3: pipe is the default separator of or validation tags, if you wish to have a pipe included within the parameter i.e. excludesall=| you will need to use the UTF-8 hex representation 0x7C, which is replaced in the code as a pipe, so the above will become excludesall=0x7C Here is a list of the current built in validators: - Tells the validation to skip this struct field; this is particularily handy in ignoring embedded structs from being validated. (Usage: -) | This is the 'or' operator allowing multiple validators to be used and accepted. (Usage: rbg|rgba) <-- this would allow either rgb or rgba colors to be accepted. This can also be combined with 'and' for example ( Usage: omitempty,rgb|rgba) structonly When a field that is a nest struct in encountered and contains this flag any validation on the nested struct will be run, but none of the nested struct fields will be validated. This is usefull if inside of you program you know the struct will be valid, but need to verify it has been assigned. NOTE: only "required" and "omitempty" can be used on a struct itself. exists Is a special tag without a validation function attached. It is used when a field is a Pointer, Interface or Invalid and you wish to validate that it exists. Example: want to ensure a bool exists if you define the bool as a pointer and use exists it will ensure there is a value; couldn't use required as it would fail when the bool was false. exists will fail is the value is a Pointer, Interface or Invalid and is nil. (Usage: exists) omitempty Allows conditional validation, for example if a field is not set with a value (Determined by the "required" validator) then other validation such as min or max won't run, but if a value is set validation will run. (Usage: omitempty) dive This tells the validator to dive into a slice, array or map and validate that level of the slice, array or map with the validation tags that follow. Multidimensional nesting is also supported, each level you wish to dive will require another dive tag. (Usage: dive) Example: [][]string with validation tag "gt=0,dive,len=1,dive,required" gt=0 will be applied to [] len=1 will be applied to []string required will be applied to string Example2: [][]string with validation tag "gt=0,dive,dive,required" gt=0 will be applied to [] []string will be spared validation required will be applied to string required This validates that the value is not the data types default zero value. For numbers ensures value is not zero. For strings ensures value is not "". For slices, maps, pointers, interfaces, channels and functions ensures the value is not nil. (Usage: required) len For numbers, max will ensure that the value is equal to the parameter given. For strings, it checks that the string length is exactly that number of characters. For slices, arrays, and maps, validates the number of items. (Usage: len=10) max For numbers, max will ensure that the value is less than or equal to the parameter given. For strings, it checks that the string length is at most that number of characters. For slices, arrays, and maps, validates the number of items. (Usage: max=10) min For numbers, min will ensure that the value is greater or equal to the parameter given. For strings, it checks that the string length is at least that number of characters. For slices, arrays, and maps, validates the number of items. (Usage: min=10) eq For strings & numbers, eq will ensure that the value is equal to the parameter given. For slices, arrays, and maps, validates the number of items. (Usage: eq=10) ne For strings & numbers, eq will ensure that the value is not equal to the parameter given. For slices, arrays, and maps, validates the number of items. (Usage: eq=10) gt For numbers, this will ensure that the value is greater than the parameter given. For strings, it checks that the string length is greater than that number of characters. For slices, arrays and maps it validates the number of items. (Usage: gt=10) For time.Time ensures the time value is greater than time.Now.UTC() (Usage: gt) gte Same as 'min' above. Kept both to make terminology with 'len' easier (Usage: gte=10) For time.Time ensures the time value is greater than or equal to time.Now.UTC() (Usage: gte) lt For numbers, this will ensure that the value is less than the parameter given. For strings, it checks that the string length is less than that number of characters. For slices, arrays, and maps it validates the number of items. (Usage: lt=10) For time.Time ensures the time value is less than time.Now.UTC() (Usage: lt) lte Same as 'max' above. Kept both to make terminology with 'len' easier (Usage: lte=10) For time.Time ensures the time value is less than or equal to time.Now.UTC() (Usage: lte) eqfield This will validate the field value against another fields value either within a struct or passed in field. usage examples are for validation of a password and confirm password: Validation on Password field using validate.Struct Usage(eqfield=ConfirmPassword) Validating by field validate.FieldWithValue(password, confirmpassword, "eqfield") eqcsfield This does the same as eqfield except that it validates the field provided relative to the top level struct. (Usage: eqcsfield=InnerStructField.Field) nefield This will validate the field value against another fields value either within a struct or passed in field. usage examples are for ensuring two colors are not the same: Validation on Color field using validate.Struct Usage(nefield=Color2) Validating by field validate.FieldWithValue(color1, color2, "nefield") necsfield This does the same as nefield except that it validates the field provided relative to the top level struct. (Usage: necsfield=InnerStructField.Field) gtfield Only valid for Numbers and time.Time types, this will validate the field value against another fields value either within a struct or passed in field. usage examples are for validation of a Start and End date: Validation on End field using validate.Struct Usage(gtfield=Start) Validating by field validate.FieldWithValue(start, end, "gtfield") gtcsfield This does the same as gtfield except that it validates the field provided relative to the top level struct. (Usage: gtcsfield=InnerStructField.Field) gtefield Only valid for Numbers and time.Time types, this will validate the field value against another fields value either within a struct or passed in field. usage examples are for validation of a Start and End date: Validation on End field using validate.Struct Usage(gtefield=Start) Validating by field validate.FieldWithValue(start, end, "gtefield") gtecsfield This does the same as gtefield except that it validates the field provided relative to the top level struct. (Usage: gtecsfield=InnerStructField.Field) ltfield Only valid for Numbers and time.Time types, this will validate the field value against another fields value either within a struct or passed in field. usage examples are for validation of a Start and End date: Validation on End field using validate.Struct Usage(ltfield=Start) Validating by field validate.FieldWithValue(start, end, "ltfield") ltcsfield This does the same as ltfield except that it validates the field provided relative to the top level struct. (Usage: ltcsfield=InnerStructField.Field) ltefield Only valid for Numbers and time.Time types, this will validate the field value against another fields value either within a struct or passed in field. usage examples are for validation of a Start and End date: Validation on End field using validate.Struct Usage(ltefield=Start) Validating by field validate.FieldWithValue(start, end, "ltefield") ltecsfield This does the same as ltefield except that it validates the field provided relative to the top level struct. (Usage: ltecsfield=InnerStructField.Field) alpha This validates that a string value contains alpha characters only (Usage: alpha) alphanum This validates that a string value contains alphanumeric characters only (Usage: alphanum) numeric This validates that a string value contains a basic numeric value. basic excludes exponents etc... (Usage: numeric) hexadecimal This validates that a string value contains a valid hexadecimal. (Usage: hexadecimal) hexcolor This validates that a string value contains a valid hex color including hashtag (#) (Usage: hexcolor) rgb This validates that a string value contains a valid rgb color (Usage: rgb) rgba This validates that a string value contains a valid rgba color (Usage: rgba) hsl This validates that a string value contains a valid hsl color (Usage: hsl) hsla This validates that a string value contains a valid hsla color (Usage: hsla) email This validates that a string value contains a valid email This may not conform to all possibilities of any rfc standard, but neither does any email provider accept all posibilities... (Usage: email) url This validates that a string value contains a valid url This will accept any url the golang request uri accepts but must contain a schema for example http:// or rtmp:// (Usage: url) uri This validates that a string value contains a valid uri This will accept any uri the golang request uri accepts (Usage: uri) base64 This validates that a string value contains a valid base64 value. Although an empty string is valid base64 this will report an empty string as an error, if you wish to accept an empty string as valid you can use this with the omitempty tag. (Usage: base64) contains This validates that a string value contains the substring value. (Usage: contains=@) containsany This validates that a string value contains any Unicode code points in the substring value. (Usage: containsany=!@#?) containsrune This validates that a string value contains the supplied rune value. (Usage: containsrune=@) excludes This validates that a string value does not contain the substring value. (Usage: excludes=@) excludesall This validates that a string value does not contain any Unicode code points in the substring value. (Usage: excludesall=!@#?) excludesrune This validates that a string value does not contain the supplied rune value. (Usage: excludesrune=@) isbn This validates that a string value contains a valid isbn10 or isbn13 value. (Usage: isbn) isbn10 This validates that a string value contains a valid isbn10 value. (Usage: isbn10) isbn13 This validates that a string value contains a valid isbn13 value. (Usage: isbn13) uuid This validates that a string value contains a valid UUID. (Usage: uuid) uuid3 This validates that a string value contains a valid version 3 UUID. (Usage: uuid3) uuid4 This validates that a string value contains a valid version 4 UUID. (Usage: uuid4) uuid5 This validates that a string value contains a valid version 5 UUID. (Usage: uuid5) ascii This validates that a string value contains only ASCII characters. NOTE: if the string is blank, this validates as true. (Usage: ascii) asciiprint This validates that a string value contains only printable ASCII characters. NOTE: if the string is blank, this validates as true. (Usage: asciiprint) multibyte This validates that a string value contains one or more multibyte characters. NOTE: if the string is blank, this validates as true. (Usage: multibyte) datauri This validates that a string value contains a valid DataURI. NOTE: this will also validate that the data portion is valid base64 (Usage: datauri) latitude This validates that a string value contains a valid latitude. (Usage: latitude) longitude This validates that a string value contains a valid longitude. (Usage: longitude) ssn This validates that a string value contains a valid U.S. Social Security Number. (Usage: ssn) ip This validates that a string value contains a valid IP Adress. (Usage: ip) ipv4 This validates that a string value contains a valid v4 IP Adress. (Usage: ipv4) ipv6 This validates that a string value contains a valid v6 IP Adress. (Usage: ipv6) mac This validates that a string value contains a valid MAC Adress defined by go's ParseMAC accepted formats and types see: http://golang.org/src/net/mac.go?s=866:918#L29 (Usage: mac) Alias Validators and Tags NOTE: when returning an error the tag returned in FieldError will be the alias tag unless the dive tag is part of the alias; everything after the dive tag is not reported as the alias tag. Also the ActualTag in the before case will be the actual tag within the alias that failed. Here is a list of the current built in alias tags: iscolor alias is "hexcolor|rgb|rgba|hsl|hsla" (Usage: iscolor) Validator notes: regex a regex validator won't be added because commas and = signs can be part of a regex which conflict with the validation definitions, although workarounds can be made, they take away from using pure regex's. Furthermore it's quick and dirty but the regex's become harder to maintain and are not reusable, so it's as much a programming philosiphy as anything. In place of this new validator functions should be created; a regex can be used within the validator function and even be precompiled for better efficiency within regexes.go. And the best reason, you can submit a pull request and we can keep on adding to the validation library of this package! Panics This package panics when bad input is provided, this is by design, bad code like that should not make it to production. type Test struct { TestField string `validate:"nonexistantfunction=1"` } t := &Test{ TestField: "Test" } validate.Struct(t) // this will panic */ package validator