issue-#14

remove internal validator.

README.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Package go-validate-yourself
 ================
-[![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/joeybloggs/go-validate-yourself.svg?branch=v3-development)](https://travis-ci.org/joeybloggs/go-validate-yourself)
+[![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/joeybloggs/go-validate-yourself.svg?branch=v3)](https://travis-ci.org/joeybloggs/go-validate-yourself)
 
 Package validator implements value validations for structs and individual fields based on tags.
 

doc.go

@@ -3,15 +3,12 @@ Package validator implements value validations for structs and individual fields
 
 Built In Validator
 
-The package contains a built in Validator instance for use,
-but you may also create a new instance if needed.
+	v3 no longer contains a built in Validator instance.
 
-	// built in
-	errs := validator.ValidateStruct(//your struct)
-	valErr := validator.ValidateFieldByTag(field, "omitempty,min=1,max=10")
+	myValidator = validator.New("validate", validator.BakedInFunctions)
 
-	// new
-	newValidator = validator.New("struct tag name", validator.BakedInFunctions)
+	errs := myValidator.ValidateStruct(//your struct)
+	valErr := myValidator.ValidateFieldByTag(field, "omitempty,min=1,max=10")
 
 A simple example usage:
 
@@ -32,7 +29,7 @@ A simple example usage:
 	// errs will contain a hierarchical list of errors
 	// using the StructValidationErrors struct
 	// or nil if no errors exist
-	errs := validator.ValidateStruct(user)
+	errs := myValidator.ValidateStruct(user)
 
 	// in this case 1 error Name is required
 	errs.Struct will be "User"
@@ -68,7 +65,7 @@ I needed to know the field and what validation failed so that I could provide an
 		return "Translated string based on field"
 	}
 
-The hierarchical structure is hard to work with sometimes.. Agreed Flatten function to the rescue!
+The hierarchical error structure is hard to work with sometimes.. Agreed Flatten function to the rescue!
 Flatten will return a map of FieldValidationError's but the field name will be namespaced.
 
 	// if UserDetail Details field failed validation
@@ -91,7 +88,7 @@ Custom functions can be added
 		return true
 	}
 
-	validator.AddFunction("custom tag name", customFunc)
+	myValidator.AddFunction("custom tag name", customFunc)
 	// NOTES: using the same tag name as an existing function
 	//        will overwrite the existing one
 
@@ -99,16 +96,16 @@ Cross Field Validation
 
 Cross Field Validation can be implemented, for example Start & End Date range validation
 
-	// NOTE: when calling validator.validateStruct(val) val will be the top level struct passed
+	// NOTE: when calling myValidator.validateStruct(val) val will be the top level struct passed
 	//       into the function
-	//       when calling validator.ValidateFieldByTagAndValue(val, field, tag) val will be
+	//       when calling myValidator.ValidateFieldByTagAndValue(val, field, tag) val will be
 	//       whatever you pass, struct, field...
-	//       when calling validator.ValidateFieldByTag(field, tag) val will be nil
+	//       when calling myValidator.ValidateFieldByTag(field, tag) val will be nil
 	//
 	// Because of the specific requirements and field names within each persons project that
-	// uses this library it is unlikely that any baked in function for this type of validation
-	// would be added, but you can add your own custom ones and keep all your validation logic
-	// in one place.
+	// uses this library it is likely that custom functions will need to be created.
+	// however there are some build in Generic Cross Field validation, see Baked In Validators and
+	// Tags below
 
 	func isDateRangeValid(val interface{}, field interface{}, param string) bool {
 
@@ -121,12 +118,6 @@ Cross Field Validation can be implemented, for example Start & End Date range va
 		return true
 	}
 
-Custom Tag Name
-
-A custom tag name can be set to avoid conficts, or just have a shorter name
-
-	validator.SetTag("valid")
-
 Multiple Validators
 
 Multiple validators on a field will process in the order defined
@@ -325,6 +316,6 @@ This package panics when bad input is provided, this is by design, bad code like
 		TestField: "Test"
 	}
 
-	validator.ValidateStruct(t) // this will panic
+	myValidator.ValidateStruct(t) // this will panic
 */
 package validator

validator.go

@@ -18,7 +18,10 @@ import (
 )
 
 const (
-	defaultTagName         = "validate"
+	tagSeparator           = ","
+	orSeparator            = "|"
+	noValidationTag        = "-"
+	tagKeySeparator        = "="
 	omitempty              = "omitempty"
 	validationFieldErrMsg  = "Field validation for \"%s\" failed on the \"%s\" tag\n"
 	validationStructErrMsg = "Struct:%s\n"
@@ -111,10 +114,6 @@ type Validator struct {
 	validationFuncs map[string]ValidationFunc
 }
 
-// var bakedInValidators = map[string]ValidationFunc{}
-
-var internalValidator = NewValidator(defaultTagName, BakedInValidators)
-
 // NewValidator creates a new Validator instance
 // NOTE: it is not necessary to create a new validator as the internal one will do in 99.9% of cases, but the option is there.
 func NewValidator(tagName string, funcs map[string]ValidationFunc) *Validator {
@@ -124,21 +123,11 @@ func NewValidator(tagName string, funcs map[string]ValidationFunc) *Validator {
 	}
 }
 
-// SetTag sets the baked in Validator's tagName to one of your choosing
-func SetTag(tagName string) {
-	internalValidator.SetTag(tagName)
-}
-
 // SetTag sets tagName of the Validator to one of your choosing
 func (v *Validator) SetTag(tagName string) {
 	v.tagName = tagName
 }
 
-// AddFunction adds a ValidationFunc to the baked in Validator's map of validators denoted by the key
-func AddFunction(key string, f ValidationFunc) error {
-	return internalValidator.AddFunction(key, f)
-}
-
 // AddFunction adds a ValidationFunc to a Validator's map of validators denoted by the key
 func (v *Validator) AddFunction(key string, f ValidationFunc) error {
 
@@ -160,12 +149,6 @@ func (v *Validator) AddFunction(key string, f ValidationFunc) error {
 	return nil
 }
 
-// ValidateStruct validates a struct and returns a struct containing the errors
-func ValidateStruct(s interface{}) *StructValidationErrors {
-
-	return internalValidator.ValidateStruct(s)
-}
-
 // ValidateStruct validates a struct and returns a struct containing the errors
 func (v *Validator) ValidateStruct(s interface{}) *StructValidationErrors {
 
@@ -206,7 +189,7 @@ func (v *Validator) validateStructRecursive(top interface{}, s interface{}) *Str
 
 		tag := typeField.Tag.Get(v.tagName)
 
-		if tag == "-" {
+		if tag == noValidationTag {
 			continue
 		}
 
@@ -257,24 +240,12 @@ func (v *Validator) validateStructRecursive(top interface{}, s interface{}) *Str
 	return validationErrors
 }
 
-// ValidateFieldByTag allows validation of a single field with the internal validator, still using tag style validation to check multiple errors
-func ValidateFieldByTag(f interface{}, tag string) *FieldValidationError {
-
-	return internalValidator.ValidateFieldByTag(f, tag)
-}
-
 // ValidateFieldByTag allows validation of a single field, still using tag style validation to check multiple errors
 func (v *Validator) ValidateFieldByTag(f interface{}, tag string) *FieldValidationError {
 
 	return v.ValidateFieldByTagAndValue(nil, f, tag)
 }
 
-// ValidateFieldByTagAndValue allows validation of a single field with the internal validator, still using tag style validation to check multiple errors
-func ValidateFieldByTagAndValue(val interface{}, f interface{}, tag string) *FieldValidationError {
-
-	return internalValidator.ValidateFieldByTagAndValue(val, f, tag)
-}
-
 // ValidateFieldByTagAndValue allows validation of a single field, still using tag style validation to check multiple errors
 func (v *Validator) ValidateFieldByTagAndValue(val interface{}, f interface{}, tag string) *FieldValidationError {
 
@@ -284,7 +255,7 @@ func (v *Validator) ValidateFieldByTagAndValue(val interface{}, f interface{}, t
 func (v *Validator) validateFieldByNameAndTagAndValue(val interface{}, f interface{}, name string, tag string) *FieldValidationError {
 
 	// This is a double check if coming from ValidateStruct but need to be here in case function is called directly
-	if tag == "-" {
+	if tag == noValidationTag {
 		return nil
 	}
 
@@ -312,11 +283,11 @@ func (v *Validator) validateFieldByNameAndTagAndValue(val interface{}, f interfa
 
 	var valErr *FieldValidationError
 	var err error
-	valTags := strings.Split(tag, ",")
+	valTags := strings.Split(tag, tagSeparator)
 
 	for _, valTag := range valTags {
 
-		orVals := strings.Split(valTag, "|")
+		orVals := strings.Split(valTag, orSeparator)
 
 		if len(orVals) > 1 {
 
@@ -330,11 +301,11 @@ func (v *Validator) validateFieldByNameAndTagAndValue(val interface{}, f interfa
 					return nil
 				}
 
-				errTag += "|" + valErr.ErrorTag
+				errTag += orSeparator + valErr.ErrorTag
 
 			}
 
-			errTag = strings.TrimLeft(errTag, "|")
+			errTag = strings.TrimLeft(errTag, orSeparator)
 
 			valErr.ErrorTag = errTag
 			valErr.Kind = fieldKind
@@ -356,7 +327,7 @@ func (v *Validator) validateFieldByNameAndTagAndValue(val interface{}, f interfa
 
 func (v *Validator) validateFieldByNameAndSingleTag(val interface{}, f interface{}, name string, valTag string) (*FieldValidationError, error) {
 
-	vals := strings.Split(valTag, "=")
+	vals := strings.Split(valTag, tagKeySeparator)
 	key := strings.Trim(vals[0], " ")
 
 	if len(key) == 0 {